FMs in the lead

Published:  03 December, 2018

FM, BESA National Conferece, Steve Tomkins, CIBSE FM Group, Geoff Prudence, SFG20

Facilities management professionals must develop their leadership skills and take greater responsibility for what goes on in buildings following the Grenfell fire tragedy, according to CIBSE FM Group chair Geoff Prudence.

Speaking at the 2018 BESA National Conference which took place in London on 1st November, Prudence asserted that FMs were best placed to lead the industry’s process of improving how it measures, monitors and improves ‘real time’ operational performance of buildings. He urged the facilities management industry to step up and grasp that opportunity.

Geoff Prudence

“For too long, risk management has focused on whether work could be delivered on time and within budget, and with some element of quality – but the real risk to building occupants is long-term operational performance and business impact,” he said. “When the FM signs off work, they need to make sure they understand the consequences and have the experience and expertise to assess the regulatory risk.

“Operational systems thinking is essential in the design team,” he added.

Prudence told the BESA Conference that the industry has the tools to carry out more accurate analysis. However, there is also great value in an experienced professional being able to use their “gut instinct” to decide whether “something just doesn’t feel right” and offer alternatives to the design team.

“Grenfell may show that, as with many other retrofit projects, decisions had been taken without fully considering the operational impact even though they were signed off at various stages of the process,” said Prudence.

“We have all experienced problems and significant building related incidents in our working lives, but when the s*** hits the fan, it is the real leaders who step forward and do the right things with the information available.

“Of course, after the event, everyone will have a view and be an ‘expert’. That is just the way it is, but I believe that real leadership means acting with authenticity and integrity every day. We have to develop that in our industry’s future leaders.”

As well as the highly regarded CIBSE Guide M for maintenance and management, and other guidance developed in collaboration by CIBSE FM, RICS and BESA, Prudence urged the sector to make proper use of digital tools to improve their overall service to clients including BESA’s SFG20 building management programme. This could help deliver the ‘Golden Thread’ of valuable operational information identified by the Hackitt Review into the Grenfell tragedy, he said.

BESA’s head of business development Steve Tomkins added that SFG20 was developing solutions to address the issues identified by the Hackitt Review using the recent update to CIBSE guide M as the foundation.

Steve Tomkins

Tomkins explained to delegates that “golden threads of building information” should be created to address the complex issue of change management and help deliver compliance and competence. He said that risk management control would highlight accountability and help to evaluate potential risks linked to proposed cost cutting. “If you have a proper, digital asset model, you can also see what is likely to happen if you make a change to an essential service – like the fire stopping,” said Tomkins.

The new SFG20 model will be linked to BESA Training and the Association’s competence registers SKILLcard and REFCOM. This should help end users understand the competence requirements needed to deliver maintenance and check they are only using competent people to carry out tasks essential to long- term performance.

“There has been a race to the bottom on cost and quality around building operation because cost is the primary driver in a competitive market with high risks and narrow margins,” Mr Tomkins told the BESA Conference. “Grenfell was a wake-up call and the information chain has to be completed by assigning responsibility – people need to put at the end of a pointy stick and reminded there are consequences to their actions.

“FM procurement is often carried out by teams who do not stick around to see what happens if they buy maintenance contracts at the cheapest price,” he added. “Indoor air quality is one crucial area that has suffered from cost cutting, but the publication of the new BB101 design rules for schools and the general focus on NOx emissions means this can now be addressed by the FM community.”

For more information go to the link below.



comments powered by Disqus

Search

Welcome

Welcome to Modern Building Services Online, the web edition of Modern Building Services (MBS) journal and the UK's most popular Building Services engineering site. Modern Building Services covers the entire Building Services Engineering industry. This site contains archived content from the journal, plus web-specific content.

When you go to our digital edition, you can also access the archive of digital editions.
December 2018: DIGITAL EDITION

ARCHIVE OF DIGITAL EDITIONS

Modern Building services has a group
on Linkedin - join us!

Jobs

  • Senior Building Services Engineer

      Invitations are invited from experienced Building Services Engineers to assist in the development of a new division within an established professional practice. The projects will be predominantly with Defence-related and Government establishments but w......

  • Building Energy Management Systems (BEMS) Engineer

      Consistently rated amongst the world's best universities, Imperial College London is a science-based institution with a reputation for excellence in teaching and research. Imperial has one of the largest and most diverse university estate portfolios in......

  • Engineering Technical Assistant

      Consistently rated amongst the world's best universities, Imperial College London is a science-based institution with a reputation for excellence in teaching and research. Imperial has one of the largest and most diverse university estate portfolios in......

more jobs »

Poll

"Is the Building Services industry lagging behind in the implementation of BIM?"